Mississippi State Troopers Assn Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 640771073
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2019–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Jackson, MS, USA
- Phone
- 6019871458
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $327,221
- Expenses
- $390,318
- Assets
- $571,474
- Liabilities
- $6,015
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
15 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JAMIE PUCKETT (President)
- SCOTT HENLEY (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- DARREN JOHNSON (Director)
- WILLIAM KING (Director)
- JAMES SCOTT (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To support the continuing betterment of criminal and civil justice in the State of Mississippi and the United States of America. To actively support legislation that betters law enforcement and to provide information to the membership of the legislature that relates thereto or that affects them as members. To support charitable organizations across the State of Mississippi and to help troopers who are in need. To advance the principles of proper law enforcement and to protect the community and rights of all citizens of the State of Mississippi. To actively represent, as an Association, the good of the membership hereof in legislation or in opposition to legislation, or in any other matter directly affecting the membership when directed to do so by a vote of the Board of Directors.
What it reported doing in 2024
To support the continuing betterment of criminal and civil justice in the State of Mississippi To actively support legislation that betters law enforcement and to provide information to the membership of the legislature that relates thereto or that affects them as members. To help troopers who are in need.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 75% for direct work, 1% for grants, and 25% for member benefits.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 88
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 35
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 97.3%; rating input score 97
- Program expense ratio: 84.3%; rating input score 84
- Fundraising efficiency: $20.64 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -19.3%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.46; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6.3% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -1.9% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -5.4% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 97.3% of revenue deployed · 84.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 7 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 15 people listed
- Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 15/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 58/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 51/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 45/100.