Mississippi State Kappa Sigma Alumni
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 273993420
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2010
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2010
- Location
- Greenwood, MS, USA
- Phone
- 6624534175
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Student Sororities, Fraternities
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $7,585
- Expenses
- $3,724
- Assets
- $3,861
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
SECTION 2. Purposes: The purposes of the Alumni Chapter are to pursue pleasure, recreation, and other similar purposes amongst both Undergraduate and Alumni Brothers of the Delta-Chi Chapter of the Kappa Sigma Fraternity (the "Delta-Chi Chapter"). In so doing, the Alumni Chapter will specifically work to support and encourage the Delta-Chi Chapter and to advance the general welfare of the Kappa Sigma Fraternity. The Alumni Chapter will hold annual meetings, special meetings and special events to promote personal contact, commingling and face-to-face fellowship amongst the Membership. The Alumni Chapter will embrace opportunities to be of service to those in need of charitable support.SECTION 3. Limitations: The Alumni Chapter will be supported by membership dues, fees, and assessments. No part of the Alumni Chapter's net earnings will inure to the benefit of any person having a personal and private interest in the organization's activities; instead, the Alumni Chapter will expend all o
What it reported doing in 2010
Contacted potential alumni members by mail out and email to get chapter organized, and set up website for communicating chapter social activities in conjunction with the undergraduate chapter. Resulted in 143 paying Kappa Sigma alumni members in initial year of formation.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 58
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 50.9%; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.04; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: Limited
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 50/100.