Mississippi Speech-language-hearing

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
646158402
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Jackson, MS, USA
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Alliance/Advocacy Organizations

Reported finances

Revenue
$173,591
Expenses
$145,242
Assets
$173,683

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Stacey Mathis MS CCC-SLP (President)
  • Mary Frances Johnson CCC-SLP (Vice President)
  • Marie Josey SLP (Vice President)
  • Krissy Beattie MS CCC-SLP (Vice President)
  • Mary Campbell MS CCC-SLP CNT (Vice President)
  • Emma Grace Olsen MS CCC-SLP (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Jenna Nassar MS CCC-SLP-BCS-S (Director)
  • Stacey Mathis MS CCC-SLP (President)
  • Mary Frances Johnson CCC-SLP (Vice President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To support audiologists and speech-language pathologists in Mississippi by providing resources, information, and professional continuin educational development opportunities promote the highest ethical and professional standards and advocate for legislation and regulation necessary for members to provide quality care for individuals with communication, hearing balance, and swallowing disorders.

What it reported doing in 2025

Annual conference for audiologists and speech-language pathologists to network and obtain continuing professional education for both members and non-members. Legislative day at the capitol is part of the advocacy for positive change initiative.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 57
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 16.3%; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.2; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -2.4% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -1.4% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 0.3% per year; rating input score 100; 27th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.