Mississippi Society of Health System Pharmacists

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
640638589
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Jackson, MS, USA
Phone
6012914854
Rating confidence
Limited

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$129,785
Expenses
$97,718
Assets
$295,202
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • LAUREN BREITE (PRESIDENT)
  • ALIX MCKAY (PRESIDENT-ELECT)

People named in this filing

  • LAUREN BREITE (PRESIDENT)
  • ALIX MCKAY (PRESIDENT-ELECT)
  • SAMANTHA GRADDY (VP)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Mshsp is a professional society of pharmacists and related personnel practicing in organized healthcare settings. The objectives of mshsp are to advance pharmaceutical care services to the public by promoting the professional interest of pharmacists in organized health systems and to foster rational drug use in society through advocating appropriate public policies toward that end. The society's mission is accomplished through an annual convention, seminars and as an association of health system pharmacists and technicians and related program activities.

What it reported doing in 2024

Mshsp makes contributions to university of Mississippi school of pharmacy which are used to support student affairs, hold annual meeting, make grants to students, maintain a membership database and website for members and perform other related functions to support program actvities including making research grants to students at university of Mississippi medical center, 2500 north state street, jackson, ms 39216.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 84% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 75
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 24.7%; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.02; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 15.2%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 4.5% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 4.1% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 11.1% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 18/100.