Mississippi Railroad Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 646025774
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2012–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Jackson, MS, USA
- Phone
- 6019651888
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $115,800
- Expenses
- $111,517
- Assets
- $85,231
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MANNING MCPHILLIPSCORNERSTONE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
People named in this filing
- ELIZABETH KENNEDY LAWLOR (BOARD MEMBER)
- AILSA VON DOBENECK (BOARD MEMBER)
- ANTOINE HAWKINS (BOARD MEMBER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide support for Mississippi railroads.
What it reported doing in 2025
The Mississippi railroad association (mrra) accomplishments for 2025: - briefed state and legislative leaders on the impact of freight rail to the economy - worked with the ms department of transportation on the development of the updated state rail plan - supported an event with association member csx thanking the team at the keesler air force base medical center-represented the rail industry on the strategic multimodal investment fund advisory committee-planned and executed two executive committee meetings as well as periodic executive committee calls-planned and executed a two-day legislative conference featuring industry briefings, grant opportunity training, and a reception. It also included meetings with legislative leaders at the state capitol.-represented ms at the aar's state relations policy committee meeting in Kansas city
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Membership-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 43
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 3.7%; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.76; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 80.7%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 1.1% per year; rating input score 100; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 41/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 50/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.