Methodist Rehabilitation
Legal name: Mississippi Methodist Hospital Rehabilitation Center Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 237067206
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Jackson, MS, USA
- Phone
- (800) 223-6672
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Hospital, Specialty
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $88,285,404
- Expenses
- $79,870,796
- Assets
- $113,218,930
- Liabilities
- $15,567,041
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
30 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DR HYUNG KIM (EX-OFFICIO (PRESIDENT MED) - PART YEAR)
- DAVID L MCMILLIN (CEO/TRUSTEE)
- DR JENNIFER VILLACORTA (EX-OFFICIO (PRESIDENT MED) - PART YEAR)
- GARY ARMSTRONG (PRESIDENT & CFO)
- TAMMY VOYNIK (VICE PRESIDENT LEGAL AFFAI)
- DOBRVIJOE STOKIC MD (VICE PRESIDENT RESEARCH)
Highest reported compensation
- DAVID L MCMILLIN (CEO/TRUSTEE): $598,444 total reported compensation
- GARY ARMSTRONG (PRESIDENT & CFO): $583,483 total reported compensation
- PHILIP BLOUNT (PHYSICIAN): $473,418 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Restoring Ability & Hope Since 1975.
What it reported doing in 2024
Ancillary services - revenue related to support the medical staff to diagnose and provide procedures ordered by medical staff, such as radiology services, pharmacy services and outpatient services just to name a few.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 90% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 61
- Transparency & Controls: 91
- Accountability: 92
- Sustainability: 61
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 64.1%; rating input score 64
- Program expense ratio: 75.9%; rating input score 76
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 95%; rating input score 95; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 9.5%; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.42; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.14; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 3.6%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2.5% per year; rating input score 100; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.8% per year; rating input score 100; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.3% per year; rating input score 100; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 4 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 64.1% of revenue deployed · 75.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 19 of 20 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $60.6M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $598K · 30 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $2.5M reported
- Consistency: 28 of 29 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 51/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 30/100.