Mississippi Association of Habitat for Humanity Affiliates Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
271724193
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2013
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2013, Form 990-N 2009
Location
Madison, MS, USA
Phone
6018980341
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Housing Development, Construction, Management

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$42,989
Expenses
$38,827
Assets
$33,390
Liabilities
$1,590

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KATHY ARINDER (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • WENDY MCDONALD (PRESIDENT)
  • BEN MITCHELL (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • BARBARA CARTER (DIRECTOR)
  • KATHY ARINDER (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • DUNCAN MCFARLANE (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To eliminate poverty housing in the state of Mississippi by working with god and people everywhere from all walks of life. Mahfha strives to unite the state's affiliates to lead in the awakening and affirming of the social consciousness of all misssissippians to recognize the need for affordable housing in affiliates' communities and throughout the state. Further, mahfha strives to bring positive change to communities with people in need by developing partnerships, connections, and resources that help Mississippi affiliates build affordable, decent housing, providing every inhabitant the opportunity to experience god's love and grow into all that god intends.

What it reported doing in 2013

Supporting the 39 habitat for humanity affiliates in the state of Mississippi with and through training and technical assistance, resource building and affiliate funding, advocacy and public awareness, and diaster preparedness and recovery.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 92% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 48% for direct work, and 52% for grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 82
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 48
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 79.1%; rating input score 79
  • Program expense ratio: 87.6%; rating input score 88

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 9.7%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.86; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 6.2%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -68.3% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -26.1% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 22.2% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 79.1% of revenue deployed · 87.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $34K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2011 to 2013
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 44/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 12/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 31/100.