Missions Together

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
392467576
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Apex, NC, USA
Phone
9194822382
Rating
75
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$10,571
Expenses
$7,050
Assets
$3,594

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Willie Harris (President)

People named in this filing

  • Mark Knetsch (Executive Dir.)
  • Carl Dobrowolski (Treasurer)
  • Willie Harris (President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Christian missions agency functioning to equip, mobilize, and support missionaries and partner organizations in spreading the Gospel worldwide.

What it reported doing in 2025

At three separate Missions: Together events, we convened nearly 250 people, in 3 separate cities, with nearly 70 churches involved and over 50+ ministries, missions or organizations, and with 5 partner organizations, to pursue the mission to advance the Great Commission through gospel unity. In addition, we put on 3 educational events to advance missions awareness. We created an event in association with the Center for Leadership Studies to promote missions & ministry leadership in the Triangle. We also published two books under the Missions: Together brand. We met consistently with leaders in NYC, the Triangle as well as JAX, FL to promote our mission and to encourage the Church to work together to advance Christs agenda.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 79
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 55
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 66.7%; rating input score 67
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 33.3%; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.51; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 66.7% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $7K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 32/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.