Missional Impact Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 820916524
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2019–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2018
- Location
- Kansas City, MO, USA
- Phone
- 8167289086
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Christianity
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $197,801
- Expenses
- $144,097
- Assets
- $90,360
- Liabilities
- $1,738
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CHARLES GEOFFREY JEFF ADAMS (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- JONDY BRITTON (SECRETARY)
- TERRY HYER (TREASURER)
- CHERYL ADAMS (BOARD MEMBER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The purposes of the missional impact is to operate a christian faith-based organization that educates, trains, coaches and offers a variety of consulting services to equip leaders for maximum impact in life, vocation, family faith and community in a culturally complex world.
What it reported doing in 2024
Lifeplan program, a personalized and actionable plan to bring missional focus to individuals. Lifeplan is essentially a strategic operating plan for an individual, discovered through a series of guided processes, tools and conversations. In 2024, missional impact begain training spanish speakers to facilitate lifeplans by introducing scholarships. The scholarships make it possible to provide training at a culturally accessible price point.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 70% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 98% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and liabilities are high compared with assets.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 76
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 63
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 67.3%; rating input score 67
- Program expense ratio: 92.4%; rating input score 92
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 27.2%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.63; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 17.3% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 19% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 16.2% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 67.3% of revenue deployed · 92.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $133K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 44/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 38/100.