Mission Rwanda

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
994566204
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Yorktown, VA, USA
Phone
7575085945
Rating
91
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Religion Related N.E.C.

Reported finances

Revenue
$79,753
Expenses
$79,753
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • William Heely (Director - Board Member President)

People named in this filing

  • William Heely (Director - Board Member President)
  • Paul Thomeer (Director - Board Member - Treasurer)
  • Gideon Munguanipe (Director - Borad Member - Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Mission Rwanda supports the ministry work of Rwanda churches. Our goal is to assist the members of Rwanda churches to obtain the necessary skills to help themselves and the community around them. This is done by providing education, vocational training, micro-agriculture projects, church and school building supplies, education scholarships, financial assistance for church staff, medical insurance for needy families, and support for a nursery school.

What it reported doing in 2025

Assist with purchase of supplies for micro-agriculture projects in the area - Purchase (16) pigs and (16) goats for for distribution to (32) families to raise and feed their families (with many have offspring) Purchase farming supplies (maize seed, bean seeds, fertilizer) of (32) families to grow and raise crops for their families

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 28
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 99.7%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 99.7%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0%; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 99.7% of revenue deployed · 99.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 9 filed program accomplishments · $80K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 3/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 43/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.