Mission of Truth
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 824608309
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Franklin, TN, USA
- Phone
- 6153004928
- Rating
- 66
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- International Relief
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $271,009
- Expenses
- $239,962
- Assets
- $51,348
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- PETER NOBLE (PRESIDENT)
- ANGELICA NOBLE (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- ANGELICA NOBLE (VICE PRESIDENT): $60,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Provides trauma therapy, nutritious meals, medical care, age-out assistance and discipleship to support the emotional, physical, and spiritual needs of the vulnerable orphans in haiti. Additionally, mission of truth partners with similar organizations in the u.s. To educate and equip local schools and businesses on the signs of human trafficking.
What it reported doing in 2025
Mission of truth employs one nurse and a nurse assistant. The nurse visits two orphanages one week and the other two the following week. Each week, the nurse performs a basic checkup for each child, taking their temperature, measuring height and weight, and assessing their bodies for any signs of skin irritations or rashes. First aid or basic medicines are dispensed as needed. All information is recorded and filed with the assistance of the nurse assistant. This facilitates the comparison of growth development month over month, and year over year for each child and AIDS in determining necessary protocol changes for malnourished or sick children. Children with concerning or critical issues or ailments are taken to the local clinic or hospital by the moto nurse and staff. All hospital visits are recorded internally. When a child requires an overnight stay in the hospital, the moto nurse accompanies the child to ensure they are not alone and are with someone they know and trust. Serious dental issues are promptly addressed. When a child experiences teeth or gum pain, moto schedules an evaluation with the dentist and ensures the resolution of the issue. When feasible, dental mission teams collaborate with moto to conduct annual cleanings for the children we serve, as well as moto staff members. In addition to medical and dental care, mission of truth assists in providing basic necessities, such as undergarments, sandals, feminine products, soap, toothpaste, and other hygienic supplies to the orphanges we serve.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most voting board members are independent. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and the filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 76
- Transparency & Controls: 55
- Accountability: 66
- Sustainability: 41
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 75.5%; rating input score 76
- Program expense ratio: 85.3%; rating input score 85
- Fundraising efficiency: $13.24 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
- Grant itemization coverage: Scored; rating input score 0
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 60%; rating input score 60; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 11.5%; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.21; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: Limited
Growth
- Program expense growth: 19% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9.4% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -7.9% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 75.5% of revenue deployed · 85.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 5 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $205K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $60K · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 22 of 22 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors and foreign activity
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2020 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 45/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 13/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 59/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.