Mission of Mercy Arizona Health Partnership Fund
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 820635905
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2020
- Location
- Phoenix, AZ, USA
- Phone
- 3016825683
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $273,533
- Expenses
- $267,745
- Assets
- $116,645
- Liabilities
- $518
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- JOSE TREJO (TREASURER): $124,188 total reported compensation
- PAULA CARVALHO (DIRECTOR/ CH): $106,985 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the organization is to support the charitable mission of mission of mercy, inc, namely to assist mission of mercy, inc. In its efforts to 1) restore dignity to the sick, poor, and homeless by providing free healthcare services and by acting as an instrument of "healing through love," 2) serve as a catalyst for change in the healthcare community and to inspire others to improve the way they serve, 3) teach its patients about healthcare and to empower them to care for themselves, 4) provide free healthcare, including medical and prescription medications, to the uninsured and under-insured working poor so they can remain healthy, self-sufficient, and able to work, 5) provide healthcare to those moving off the welfare system and into work, and 6) provide healthcare to the economically disadvantaged that are in transition from being recently unemployed to seeking new employment.
What it reported doing in 2024
Supported mission of mercy, inc. In its mission as defined in the organization's mission statement. The Arizona mobile medical program provided 11,141 free patient visits and dispensed 31,236 free prescription medications to low-income, uninsured, and underinsured arizonans at six rotating sites across maricopa county.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 58
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 87
- Sustainability: 37
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 61.6%; rating input score 62
- Program expense ratio: 62.6%; rating input score 63
- Fundraising efficiency: $4.24 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 77.8%; rating input score 78; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 2.1%; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.44; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 8.7%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -13.4% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 14% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 11.7% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 61.6% of revenue deployed · 62.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 9 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $168K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $124K · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 19/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 44/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 22/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 30/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 50/100.