Mission Mbale
Legal name: Mission Mbale Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 812896272
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2019–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Newnan, GA, USA
- Phone
- 770-313-5394
- Rating
- 73
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- International Relief
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $413,684
- Expenses
- $473,703
- Assets
- $136,297
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- WARREN MOORE (PRESIDENT)
- MICHAEL EMEOTT (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- WARREN MOORE (PRESIDENT)
- MICHAEL EMEOTT (VICE PRESIDENT)
- MARY FAYE MOORE (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
We exist to share the hope and love found in Jesus Christ while addressing essential life needs one child at a time.
What it reported doing in 2024
Continued the program of feeding over 500 children each day which includes three meals a day at the primary school and a lunch meal at the church for secondary school students who would otherwise not have a meal. The child sponsorship program increased to over 250 students being sponsored which ensured their ability to attend school. Celebrated another successful school year as all eighteen primary 7th grade students passed their p.l.e. (primary leaving exam) which qualified them for placement in the secondary school. Purchase of a 15 passenger van at the start of the school year in february for school use and its functions. At the school many improvements were made which include the completion of the classrooms 16,17 and 18 which brings the school block structure to full functional use. The kitchen was upgraded to include cooking stoves to a covered outside location for improved ventilation. Additional cooking supplies were purchased for proper utilization of the upgrade. An incinerator was constucted to provide proper disposal of medical waste for the medical clinic located at the school. Other improvements at the school include an expansion of the boys latrine for bathing, a commercial printer for school use, purchase of security cameras and instalation of solar lighting throuhgout the school grounds for increased security. We enrolled many of the sponsored children in vocational programs which include nursing, mechanics, beautician, hotel catering, secretarial, and technology. This will allow for income and self sustanability in the future. We continue to emphasize community service projects for the children enrolled at the school. The students continue to excel in sports, fine arts, and academic competitions. The staff at the school participated in continuing education classes throughout the year. For the first time in five years, due to covid restrictions, we were able to take a team from america which included youth. This team witnessed a day long dedication of the school to the community which was attended by government leaders from the country. One of the biggest accomplishments was being able to begin construction on a multipurpose use building at the school which will serve as a dining hall for the over 315 students who now attend the school. This building will also serve as a meeting place for the church that currently meets at the school and can also be utilized for community functions.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 87% of its reported program spending out as grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and the filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 89
- Transparency & Controls: 83
- Accountability: 30
- Sustainability: 30
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
- Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
- Requires narrative reports: Fail
- Conducts field audits: Fail
- May suspend future funding: Fail
- Requires financial reports: Pass
- Conducts site visits: Pass
- Requires grant agreements: Fail
- May require repayment: Fail
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -14.5%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.29; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 8.3% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.7% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.8% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 3 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 5 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $474K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 16 of 16 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors and foreign activity
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2019 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 5 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 18/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 15/100.