Mission Flyers

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
860868560
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2016–2020
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2020
Location
Scottsdale, AZ, USA
Phone
6023150323
Rating
60
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
International Relief

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$98,504
Expenses
$18,590
Assets
$241,565
Liabilities
$104

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

2 people listed

People named in this filing

  • DANIEL KROPP (Director)
  • RICHARD VIETOR (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Flight services for disabled veterans and kids with cancer

What it reported doing in 2020

During 2019, its seventh year, mission flyers continued in its focus on program development and networking with va hospitals, military amputee facilities such as the brooke army medical center, san antonio, Texas and other disabled veteran organizations. In addition, through various organizations, mission flyers contined offering flight training and services to children with cancer and other serious illnesses, disabilities and other extreme life challenges. Mission flyers purchased one aircraft during 2020

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 21
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 84
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 8%; rating input score 8
  • Program expense ratio: 42.3%; rating input score 42

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 81.1%; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 12.99; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 0.5% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.5% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 13.3% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 8% of revenue deployed · 42.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $8K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2016 to 2020
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 8/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 42/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 45/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.