Mission Films

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
463575346
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
San Francisco, CA, USA
Phone
4159909932
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Arts, Culture, and Humanities N.E.C.

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$109,388
Expenses
$108,179
Assets
$29,050
Liabilities
$21,601

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ELLEN BRUNO (PRESIDENT)
  • ELLEN KURAS (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • ELLEN BRUNO (PRESIDENT)
  • ELLEN KURAS (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • LAURA FREEBAIRNSMITH (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Brunofilms has focused on issues at the forefront of human rights including burmese prostitution, tibetan nuns, health care in cambodia,, and homelessness. These films have been used extensively in schools and universities and to raise funds for local initiatives and projects overseas. Brunofilms will continue to produce educational media and organize outreach efforts to domestic and international audiences.

What it reported doing in 2024

Brunofilms maintained a multifaceted outreach and distribution campaign of the film split to educational institutions throughout the country, court systems and public libraries. Brunofilms also completed the writing, design, and printing of a comprehensive viewers guild for the film split, and began an expansive campaign to get this resource to the institutions and families who are working to ease the negative impact of divorce on children. Brunofilms has completed extensive research and preproduction for split teens, a media resource which will go into production in august 2016.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 25
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 1.1%; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.27; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.74; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 56.3%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 15.5% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 12.7% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 37/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 23/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 7/100.