Mission Cedar Hill

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
832180511
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2022
Location
Cedar Hill, TX, USA
Phone
4695568768
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Housing Rehabilitation

Reported finances

Revenue
$141,971
Expenses
$83,012
Assets
$274,514
Liabilities
$956

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • TOBY SNOWDEN (PRESIDENT/DI)

People named in this filing

  • TOBY SNOWDEN (PRESIDENT/DI)
  • CAROLYN MCKEE (DIRECTOR)
  • STEVE SCOTT (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Coordinating government, corporate and private resources for the betterment and restoration of the community.

What it reported doing in 2025

The organization seeks to serve the community of cedar hill, Texas by reaching out to its members who are unable to afford critical repairs to their homes due to financial constraints. These repairs are required to assist homeowners in being in code compliance with the city's requirements. The organization coordinates with the homeowner on the necessary work to be performed and then coordinates teams of volunteers to accomplish the defined repairs with the organization providing the necessary supplies. During 2025 more than 30 homeowners were assisted and more than 500 volunteers contributed their time and energy to the work.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 54% for direct work, and 46% for grants.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 66
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 74
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 52%; rating input score 52
  • Program expense ratio: 88.9%; rating input score 89

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 41.5%; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.31; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 45.7%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 15.4% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 19.6% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 48.2% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 52% of revenue deployed · 88.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $74K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 52/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 6/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 43/100.