Missio Dei Network Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
992568391
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
Location
Arlington, TX, USA
Phone
8333726482
Rating
42
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$66,915
Expenses
$61,081
Assets
$22,896
Liabilities
$233

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Terry Jeffries (President and CEO)

People named in this filing

  • Terry Jeffries (President and CEO)
  • Justin Jeffries (Secretary and Treasurer)
  • Brian Cropp (Director, Board Chair)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The primary exempt purpose of Missio Dei Network, Inc. is to encourage evangelical Christian churches, like-minded Christians, and Christian ministries to support the Lord's mission to make disciples. The organization serves churches and ministries that are in agreement with its statement of faith in four areas including church planting, church health and renewal, missions' mobilization, and finance and administration. Within each of these four areas, the organization provides educational resources and grants as well as coaching assistance. In providing these services and resources the organization will be acting as a connectional resource-provider for like-minded churches and ministries to further the Kingdom of God, thereby accomplishing religious purposes.

What it reported doing in 2025

In Church Planting, Missio Dei Network, Inc. provided free sound and lighting equipment to Frontier Church in Aledo, Texas. This equipment was donated to Missio Dei Network by a disbanding church start that failed. Missio Dei Network also began providing a monthly church planting grant to Resonate Church in Pullman, WA.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 39
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 8.7%; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.37; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 41.8%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 26/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 59/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 4/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 25/100.