Miss Delaware Scholarship Program Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 510208902
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Felton, DE, USA
- Phone
- 3022700174
- Rating
- 62
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $76,583
- Expenses
- $111,781
- Assets
- $204,986
- Liabilities
- $70,024
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JOANNA TALMO (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- BETH ANN JONES (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- JOANNA TALMO (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- BETH ANN JONES (PRESIDENT)
- TRACEY ENG (SCHOLARSHIP DIRECTOR AND TREASU)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Miss Delaware Scholarship Pageant, Inc provides scholarship opportunities to young women in the State of Delaware
What it reported doing in 2024
The Miss Delaware Scholarship Program, Inc. provides educational scholarships and financial assistance to young women throughout Delaware while promoting academic excellence, leadership, and personal development. Over the past five years, the organization has awarded $161,950 in scholarships to 56 young women. During the 2025 tax year, 16 Miss and Teen candidates participated in the Miss Delaware Scholarship Competitions. Using participant entry fees, the organization provided state sashes and crowns, meals during competition week, participant apparel, and leadership activities that enhanced the scholarship experience. Several local and state scholarship recipients reside in Delaware communities that are considered underserved, ensuring that educational and leadership opportunities are accessible to young women who may otherwise face financial or social barriers.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 75% for direct work, and 25% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and the filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 87
- Transparency & Controls: 60
- Accountability: 12
- Sustainability: 32
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 93.3%; rating input score 93
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 84.6%; rating input score 85; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 0%; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -46%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.83; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.34; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 18.2% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9.1% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.2% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 93.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 6 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $104K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 18 of 20 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 0/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 30/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 33/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 12/100.