Mirasol Health Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 570774530
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Bluffton, SC, USA
- Phone
- 8437062296
- Rating
- 73
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $6,901,267
- Expenses
- $6,877,271
- Assets
- $6,184,185
- Liabilities
- $778,781
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
17 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JAMES DISMOND (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
Highest reported compensation
- JAMES DISMOND (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $188,263 total reported compensation
- GINA HARRIS (CHIEF CLINICAL OFFICER): $127,541 total reported compensation
- MEGAN S SWARTZ (NURSE PRACTICIONER): $123,284 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Mirasol health is a nonprofit, community-focused healthcare organization dedicated to honoring life through compassionate care and support for individuals facing chronic conditions, end-of-life, or grief. Proudly serving beaufort, jasper, hampton, and colleton counties, mirasol health is committed to inspiring trust, embracing life, and supporting your health and wellness goals.
What it reported doing in 2025
Rays of hope is a specialized program supporting the emotional and psychological well-being of patients and families facing serious illness and end-of-life challenges. As part of mirasol health's continuum of care, it ensures emotional needs are addressed alongside medical and palliative services.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 86% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 70
- Transparency & Controls: 65
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 31
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 76%; rating input score 76
- Program expense ratio: 80.7%; rating input score 81
- Fundraising efficiency: $1.81 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0.3%; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.9; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.13; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 11.2%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 9.4% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.4% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.7% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 76% of revenue deployed · 80.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $5.5M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $188K · 17 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 4 contractors listed · $561K reported
- Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 4/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 28/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 30/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 30/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 44/100.