Miracle Outreach Ministries Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
591798553
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2012–2015
Forms available
Form 990 2011, Form 990-EZ 2015
Location
Jacksonville, FL, USA
Phone
9047338318
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Christianity
Affiliation
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$191,894
Expenses
$151,053
Assets
$158,322

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

People named in this filing

  • PATRICIA HOLLIDAY (PRES/MIN)
  • KATHERINE P HOLLIDAY (SECTY)
  • ALEXANDER V HOLLIDAY (TREAS)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Miracle outreach ministries, inc operates as a protestant church for teaching and preaching christianity as set forth in the holy bible. Income to support the activities are from individuals, church collections, investments of funds held for future expansions, and sales of religious books and tapes. All funds are used to accomplish the organizations exempt purpose and to provide funds for expanding its exempt purpose.

What it reported doing in 2015

Miracle outreach ministries, inc meets weekly as a protestant church and teaches and preaches christianity as set forth in the holy bible to meet the needs of its parishioners.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration and the available information about grant readiness automatic revocation leaves an important question unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 86
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 60
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 77.5%; rating input score 78
  • Program expense ratio: 98.5%; rating input score 98

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 21.3%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.05; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 6.9%; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 36.4% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 34.5% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 33.7% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 77.5% of revenue deployed · 98.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $149K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2012 to 2015
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 27/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.