Miracle of Love Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
593455949
IRS 990 coverage
2013–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Orlando, FL, USA
Phone
4078431760
Rating
83
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Victims' Services

Reported finances

Revenue
$4,902,410
Expenses
$5,007,613
Assets
$1,048,590
Liabilities
$444,886

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • STEPHEN JACKSON (PRESIDENT)
  • ANGUS BRADSHAW (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • ANGUS BRADSHAW (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $156,492 total reported compensation
  • DIANA LINEBURGH (ACCOUNTANT): $107,664 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of miracle of love, inc. Is to provide comprehensive, multicultural HIV/AIDS care, education, and prevention services that are effective and responsive to the central Florida communities.

What it reported doing in 2024

Topwa: this is a service contract that provides outreach, education, and linkage for women of childbearing years focusing on the needs of HIV-infected pregnant women, known as the targeted outreach for pregnant women act(topwa) program. The purpose of the topwa program is to prevent substance abuse exposure of infants and the transmission of HIV to women and their unborn babies. Orange county substance abuse and HIV prevention navigator program for racial/ethnic minorities - samhsa: provide HIV and hepatitis screening and education to individuals identified as high-risk. Link high-risk HIV- individuals to prep services and link HIV+ individuals that qualify for ryan white medical case management services. Clients that are not eligible for ryan white services are refer to a provider that offers free or work on a sliding fee scale. Ensure that staff has continued education thru aetc in the areas of substance abuse, mental health, and proper health care.fiscal sponsorships: the organization's fiscal sponsorship of groups are generally on an on-going basis. The organization accepts funds on behalf of these organizations for specific programs related to HIV/AIDS. In all cases, the organization has variance power over the fiscal sponsorship contributions it receives. Currently, there are two fiscal sponsorships - bros in convo and divas in dialogue.ryan white part b (rwpb): early intervention services (eis) provide service coordination for clients that are lost to care or out of care defined by the ryan white part b office. The coordination of care services includes county health departments, community-based organizations, AIDS service organizations, and other ryan white grantees.ending the epidemic (ehe) funding in central Florida, particularly in orlando, plays a critical role in addressing the HIV epidemic by supporting prevention, care, and treatment initiatives. This funding empowers local organizations to provide comprehensive services, including testing, prep access, education, and linkage to care, targeting disproportionately affected populations such as lgbtq+ communities, communities of color, and underserved individuals. With orlando's high HIV prevalence rate, ete funding ensures that resources are allocated to reduce new transmissions, improve health outcomes, and combat stigma, ultimately working toward the goal of ending the epidemic by 2030. Viiv $100,000 : this program strengthens and expands culturally responsive HIV prevention, wellness, and leadership development services for transgender women of color, spanish-speaking individuals living with HIV, and black gay and bisexual men through divas in dialogue, latidos, and bros in convo at stafford house. Its goals are to expand access to affirming, trauma-informed care, increase community engagement, improve HIV care retention, and build leadership among marginalized lgbtq+ populations in central Florida.borealis $70,000 : this rapid response funding initiative provides flexible, emergency support to organizations facing urgent threats to democracy, justice, and safety, prioritizing those working at the intersections of disability, immigrant, racial, reproductive, queer, and trans rights.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 87% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 64% for direct work, and 36% for grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 89
  • Transparency & Controls: 71
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 23
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 88.7%; rating input score 89
  • Program expense ratio: 86.8%; rating input score 87
  • Fundraising efficiency: $178.87 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -2.1%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.21; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.42; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 5.3%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 11.8% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 10.3% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 6.9% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 88.7% of revenue deployed · 86.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 4 of 4 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $4.3M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $156K · 6 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2013 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 26/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 6/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 25/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 52/100.