Miracle League of Green Bay

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
205825658
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Green Bay, WI, USA
Phone
9204972298
Rating
47
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Baseball, Softball

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$138,923
Expenses
$56,077
Assets
$241,106
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SCOTT HERBER (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • TIM JORGENSEN (PRESIDENT)
  • GARY ROGACZEWSKI (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • LAURA MOSSAKOWSKI (DIRECTOR)
  • RICK CHERNICK (DIRECTOR)
  • KURT GAJESKI (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

An organized baseball league for kids, ages 4-19, with any physical &/or mental disability

What it reported doing in 2025

Our mission also includes construction of special facilities that meet the needs of families of children with mental or physical challenges. The baseball program with the construction of a unique rubbber surface ball field is one means. The construction of an all inclusive playground at the site with access in and around the play equipment for children in wheel chairs is another. A soft, clean, rubber surface is part of this construction. During 2017 a significant investment was made for the replacement of the rubber surface of the field, which has worn from 12 years of use.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 87% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 82
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 59.6%; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.3; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 30.3%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -17.9% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 0.3% per year; rating input score 100; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 0.5% per year; rating input score 100; 27th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 12/100.