Miracle Flights
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 880209952
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Las Vegas, NV, USA
- Phone
- 7022610494
- Rating
- 72
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $7,128,579
- Expenses
- $4,382,867
- Assets
- $52,284,905
- Liabilities
- $10,334,454
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MARK BROWN (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- MARK BROWN (CEO): $693,628 total reported compensation
- ANNE MCGEE (FORMER OFFICER): $331,399 total reported compensation
- ROBERT SANCHEZ (VP-CORP.): $157,866 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Miracle flights is a national charity that provides free commercial airline tickets for u.s. Residents in need of distant medical care not available in their own communities.
What it reported doing in 2024
Miracle flights is a national charity that provides free commercial airline tickets for u.s. Residents in need of distant medical care not available in their own communities. With the cost of air travel continually rising, it is no surprise that 83% of families experience financial hardship from medical expenses. In fact, a full 61% of bankruptcies occur because of medical expenses, including transportation costs. While insurance may cover actual treatment, it rarely covers the cost of travel. As a result, some patients will go untreated or misdiagnosed, simply because the cannot afford to get to the experts who can effectively treat their condition. That is where miracle flights comes in. We alleviate the financial burden of travel so patients and their families can focus on treatment and recovery.miracle flights provides commercial plane tickets to all us-based medical treatment facilities at no cost to patients or their families. We take care of scheduling, booking and ensuring compliance with all medical clearance requirements.we help treat all diseases for patients of every age. Simply put, we will fly anyone with a complex medical need who requires distant medical care as many times as needed.we know that family plays a crucial role in the healing process, so we fund flights for companions as well. For patients under 18, we pay to fly both parents or legal guardians. For adult patients, we pay to fly one caregiver or companion.to ensure that we assist as many patients as possible, we work to raise awareness of our services across the country. Targeted initiatives focus on hospital, doctors, social workers and various health organizations; while broader marketing and public relations campaigns reach a wider audience via free, earned and paid media.these outreach efforts, backed by a robust fundraising strategy, will ensure our organization's future for decades to come. With the support of our generous donors, we will continue to provide access to the nation's best medical specialists, brightening the future for thousands of american families every year as we provide "the cure for distance".
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 72% for direct work, and 28% for grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 61
- Transparency & Controls: 69
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 74
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 69.4%; rating input score 69
- Program expense ratio: 51.9%; rating input score 52
- Fundraising efficiency: $13.04 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 38.5%; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 11.93; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.2; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 27.9%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.4% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -21.4% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1% per year; rating input score 100; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 69.4% of revenue deployed · 51.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $694K · 9 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 30 of 31 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 52/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 46/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 6/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 44/100.