Mint Museum of Art Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 560670666
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Charlotte, NC, USA
- Phone
- 7043372000
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Art Museums
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $14,644,029
- Expenses
- $15,458,557
- Assets
- $102,652,411
- Liabilities
- $2,319,731
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
30 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DR TODD A HERMAN (PRESIDENT & CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- DR TODD A HERMAN (PRESIDENT & CEO): $386,483 total reported compensation
- GARY C BLANKEMEYER (COO/CFO): $224,478 total reported compensation
- JENNIFER SUDUL EDWARDS (CHIEF CURATOR): $171,957 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mint museum welcomes all to be inspired and transformed through the power of art and creativity.
What it reported doing in 2024
For the majority of fy25, the mint museum continued its core activities, including expanding its permanent collections through important acquisitions; launching new exhibitions comprising works from the permanent collections and on loan; engaging visitors of all ages and backgrounds through education and outreach initiatives; and implementing new communication strategies, technologies, and methods to reach and engage new audiences. The museum presented an exciting roster of major mint organized and special loan exhibitions in fy25: whitfield lovell: passages was the most comprehensive exhibition of the artist's work to date. Whitfield lovell is renowned for his masterful conte crayon portraits and multi-sensory installations that focus on aspects of african american history, while raising universal questions about identity, memory, and america's collective heritage. Organized by the american federation of arts, it brought together, for the first time, two of lovell's major installations, deep river and visitation: the richmond project. Photographs of african americans taken between the emancipation proclamation and the civil rights movement inspired his exquisite drawings created on paper or, as part of his tableaux, rendered on salvaged wooden boards.southern/modern organized by the mint museum was the first exhibition to provide a comprehensive survey of progressive art created in the american south during the first half of the twentieth century. The exhibition took a broad view of the south, considering artists working in the states below the mason-dixon line and as far west as those bordering the Mississippi river. It also examined the significant role played by women artists and artists of color into the various thematic sections of the exhibition rather than examining them in isolation, providing a fuller, richer, and more accurate overview of the artistic activity in the region than has been previously presented. The mint once again partnered with its affiliate group, the young affiliates of the mint, to present coined in the south. This juried show continues to bridge the gap between the museum, the gallery, and the studio by highlighting thought-provoking works produced by contemporary southeastern artists and innovators.finally, annie leibovitz / work introduced an exciting and diverse body of new work in this major traveling exhibition organized by the crystal bridges museum of american art. In 1973, at the age of 23, leibovitz was named rolling stone magazine's chief photographer. In 2000 she was designated a library of congress living legend. For these new images, leibovitz turned her lens toward more than 50 leaders in the arts, sports, politics, and business spheres to shine a light on luminaries such as beyonce and jay z, elon musk, ketanji brown jackson, yayoi kusama, and others. Presented via large format digital displays, these works were accompanied by perspectives from the sitters. Additionally, the mint continues to present its constellationclt series. This initiative has positioned the museum as a key player in, and supporter of, the rapidly expanding charlotte artist community.the mint continued to successfully host community engagement programs, to build on the deep relationships made with both partners and participants, such as mint to move, wild wednesdays, bilingual stories and music, wednesday night live, and drop in art at mint museum randolph. Additionally, we continued to distribute free art kits - fun and easy activities, complete with supplies, to create art at home. The monthly free art kit corresponds to an exhibition on view or a piece from the mint's permanent collection. Typically, about five hundred kits are handed out to the public each month. Finally, the last sunday of each month is party in the park at mint museum randolph. Fy25 exhibitions also allowed the mint to recognize the following: demonstrate diversity of voices in exhibitions; engage local and regional artists as co-support
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 72% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 79
- Transparency & Controls: 79
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 47
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 87.3%; rating input score 87
- Program expense ratio: 80.6%; rating input score 81
- Fundraising efficiency: $8.5 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -5.6%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.64; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 8.3%; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.5% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -8.7% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -0.1% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 87.3% of revenue deployed · 80.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 23 of 23 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $12.5M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $386K · 30 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed · $1.3M reported
- Consistency: 36 of 36 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 34/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 16/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 28/100.