Minorities in Law Enforcement

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
680316205
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2017–2019
Forms available
Form 990 2016, Form 990-EZ 2019
Location
Sacramento, CA, USA
Phone
9167613832
Rating
33
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Alliance/Advocacy

Reported finances

Revenue
$533
Expenses
$15,560
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ELI MOLINA (PRESIDENT)
  • ALLEN HUMPHRIES (EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT)
  • SOLANGE BROOKS (VICE PRESIDENT/TREASURER)
  • STEPHEN WALKER (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)

People named in this filing

  • ELI MOLINA (PRESIDENT)
  • ALLEN HUMPHRIES (EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT)
  • SOLANGE BROOKS (VICE PRESIDENT/TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To promote social welfare by educating the public and advocating on issues concerning enhancement of public safety; promotion of measures to reduce crime; work with at-risk youth to minimize their negative association with law enforcement.

What it reported doing in 2019

The work groups project is dedicated to the needs and interests of teens to promote increased use of productive outlets in a safe gathering place, improve their risk-avoidance skills and have increased leadership opportunities to develop personal competencies through participation in the arts and other activities. In addition, mentoring opportunities for new officers in californians for safe neighborhoods provided opportunities for young people from at-risk environments to participate with officers in activities and outings beyond normal community settings, with the intent of fostering and instilling civic responsibility.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 8
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -2,819.3%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -85% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -13.1% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -5.2% per year; rating input score 0; 25th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2017 to 2019
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is not authorized to operate as a charity in California.