Minooka Hockey Club Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 332788974
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Joliet, IL, USA
- Phone
- 8153259748
- Rating
- 52
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Winter Sports
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $149,784
- Expenses
- $98,043
- Assets
- $51,741
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DAN MANNO (President)
People named in this filing
- DAN MANNO (President)
- JOHN MENDOZA (VP/TREASURER)
- ANDREA MATTISON (REGISTRATION)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The minooka hockey club is a non-profit organization that strives to provide student-athletes with an opportunity to proudly represent minooka high school while developing their hockey skills, fostering a strong sense of community, and preparing for future success both on and off the ice. The program emphasizes personal growth, teamwork, accountability, and leadership, instilling values that extend beyond the rink. Minooka hockey club is committed to balancing athletic excellence with academic achievement, ensuring players excel in the classroom and on the ice. Through a supportive and inclusive environment, minooka hockey club aims to inspire confidence, camaraderie, and a lifelong passion for hockey, empowering students to reach their full potential as athletes, leaders, and individuals.
What it reported doing in 2025
Provide student-athletes with an opportunity to develop their hockey skills, foster a strong sense of community, and prepare for future success both on and off the ice.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 32
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 59
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 26.7%; rating input score 27
- Program expense ratio: 40.7%; rating input score 41
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 34.5%; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.53; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 26.7% of revenue deployed · 40.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $40K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 27/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 41/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 39/100.