Minnewaska Home Care Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
331124162
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2017
Forms available
Form 990 2017, Form 990-EZ 2009
Location
Starbuck, MN, USA
Phone
3202392217
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Home Health Care

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$222,871
Expenses
$209,367
Assets
$115,773
Liabilities
$2,304

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

13 people listed

Highest reported compensation

  • CHRISTOPHER KNOLL (ADMINISTRATOR): $102,502 total reported compensation
  • BRIAN ENGLER (DIRECTOR OF FINANCE (THRU APRIL 2018)): $75,112 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

A community of services, grounded in faith, providing person centered care that encourages all people to reach their highest potential.

What it reported doing in 2017

Minnewaska home care, a medicare certified home care agency, promotes health of the community members it serves by providing a variety of health care services in the patient's home setting. Our services include but are not limited to skilled nursing, home health aid, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech therapy and homemaking services within a 30-mile radius of starbuck, mn. Minnewaska home care provides these services on a daily basis monday thru friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm, and has a 24-hour on call registered nurse available for emergencies.minnewaska home care is governed by a ten person independent board made up of one at-large community leader and ten area church members. The board has a history of commitment to acting with the highest integrity and has been proactively evaluating opportunities to ensure the organization continues to operate at its maximum potential for the benefit of the clients we serve.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 96% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 79
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 84
  • Sustainability: 44
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 94.1%; rating input score 94
  • Program expense ratio: 80.6%; rating input score 81
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 6.1%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.55; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 11.7%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -3.3% per year; rating input score 0; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -0.1% per year; rating input score 0; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -0.6% per year; rating input score 0; 32nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 94.1% of revenue deployed · 80.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $169K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $103K · 13 people listed
  • Consistency: 25 of 26 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2010 to 2017
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 8 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 28/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 56/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 31/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 49/100.