Minnesota Women Lawyers
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 510231778
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Minneapolis, MN, USA
- Phone
- 6123383205
- Rating
- 44
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $428,130
- Expenses
- $415,707
- Assets
- $380,030
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
19 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Debra Pexa (Executive Director)
- Dionne Blake (President Elect)
- Emerald Gratz (President)
- Poonam Kumar (Past President)
Highest reported compensation
- Debra Pexa (Executive Director): $157,293 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To advance the success of women attorneys and strive for a just society.
What it reported doing in 2024
The MWL Annual Rosalie Wahl Leadership Lecture (Fall 2024) Minnesota Women Lawyers (MWL) held the 30th Annual Rosalie Wahl Leadership Lecture on the evening of Thursday, November 14, 2024 at the University of Minnesota McNamara Alumni Center (200 SE Oak Street, Minneapolis). The program was held from 5:30 to 7:00 p.m., with a reception following the program. MWL was pleased to welcome Laura Coates, Anchor and Chief Legal Analyst at CNN, as our keynote speaker. Prior to the keynote remarks, the MWL Foundation presented its 2024 Law Student Scholarships and led its annual "Direct Appeal." The MWL Awards & Recognition Committee also presented the 2024 Social Justice Writing Award. Laura Coates is CNN's chief legal analyst and anchor of Laura Coates Live, airing weeknights at 10:00 pm CST. The show showcases the day's most interesting stories with smart, provocative, and thoughtful analysis, while leveraging Coates' significant experience as a prosecutor and relentless pursuit of the facts. A native of Saint Paul, MN, Coates graduated from Princeton University's School of Public and International Affairs and the University of Minnesota Law School, where she serves on the Board of Advisors. She practiced law in Minnesota and New York handling cases ranging from intellectual property litigation and First Amendment issues to defamation and media law. Called to public service, she transitioned from private practice to the U.S. Department of Justice, and served as a trial attorney in the Civil Rights Division during the Bush and Obama administrations, specializing in the enforcement of voting rights throughout the country. She also served as an Assistant U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, prosecuting a myriad of violent felony offenses. The keynote speaker did not receive an honorarium. About the MWL Rosalie Wahl Leadership Lecture: The 2024 Wahl Lecture was the 30th event in the Rosalie Wahl Leadership Lecture series, first established by Minnesota Women Lawyers in 1994. The series honors the career of Justice Rosalie Wahl, the first woman justice to serve on the Minnesota Supreme Court, and was created on the occasion of her retirement from the Court. The series features women who inspire the leaders of tomorrow just as Justice Wahl inspired so many of us.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 79
- Accountability: 84
- Sustainability: 43
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 2.9%; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.91; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 37.8%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -2.7% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 0.6% per year; rating input score 100; 27th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 19 of 19 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $26K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $157K · 19 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 9 of 10 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Functional expense sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 46/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 38/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.