Minnesota Telecom Alliance

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
410418730
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Madelia, MN, USA
Phone
6512917311
Rating confidence
Limited

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,150,907
Expenses
$2,119,408
Assets
$1,203,810
Liabilities
$335,543

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • BRENT CHRISTENSEN (CEO/PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • BRENT CHRISTENSEN (CEO/PRESIDENT): $237,447 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Mta is organized for the purpose of enhancing the success and viability of its telecommunications industry members in an increasingly competitive environment.

What it reported doing in 2024

With over 180 members, the mta actively advocates and represents the interests of Minnesota's telecom industry, including small, medium and large telecommunications companies that provide advanced voice, data, high-speed internet and wireless communications services. The organization serves its members by informing and educating member companies on subjects relating to the telecommunications industry; developing and promoting uniform standards of communications services, procedures and practices; supporting the provision of high quality, universal service for consumers; informing and educating consumers, legislators and regulators on the necessity, applications and benefits of a reliable, efficient and modern telecommunications infrastructure and the need for adequate compensation to fund the infrastructure; and by representing the member companies' interests before the general public and legislative and regulatory bodies. Mta hosts one of the nation's largest state telecommunications convention and trade show. The 2025 annual convention was held march 10 through march 12, 2025 and included general and breakout sessions, networking opportunities and exhibits. Mta communicates with its members through its bi-weekly electronic newsletters. Mta has numerous member driven committees and peer groups that provide networking opportunities for members to engage and share common practices and technical expertise. Mta conducts an annual "day on the hill" where members engage with their local legislators on issues relating to telecommunications.mta offers training programs to meet the needs of its members. Its safety program is a total safety, health, and environmental loss-control program designed specifically for independent telephone companies.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 99% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 71
  • Accountability: 84
  • Sustainability: 32
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 1.5%; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.57; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.28; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 11.2%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 4.5% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -2.9% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $237K · 12 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 11 of 11 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes executive pay
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 39/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 20/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 26/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 36/100.