Minnesota State Association of Narcotics Investigators

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
412017947
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2022
Location
Moorhead, MN, USA
Phone
2182995131
Rating confidence
Limited

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$71,245
Expenses
$64,614
Assets
$102,842

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ANDY JOHNSON (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • ANDY JOHNSON (PRESIDENT)
  • DAN MILLER (VICE PRESIDE)
  • ADAM TORGERSON (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Providing narcotic related courses to officers, attorneys, and citizens

What it reported doing in 2025

Hosted annual conference with over 340 members in attendance. Provided training to members on topics relevant to narcotics enforcement. Provided an accidental death insurance plan to all members in good standing. Board members traveled to Washington d.c. To educate legislators and staff on current drug trends during the annual national narcotics officers association conference. Board members participated in the inaugural state narcotic associations executive summit in las vegas, nv with the mission to better enhance, further prepare, and foster collaboration among leaders of states' associations. Board members also attended several other state narcotics association conferences to share current drug trends, attend training, and foster collaboration amoung states' associations. Sponsored napwda k9 training/certification conference as well as constitutional law training.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 98% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 52
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 9.3%; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.59; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 5.1% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -3.1% per year; rating input score 0; 28th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 59/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.