Minnesota Shakespeare Theater
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 811207603
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2021–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2020, Form 990-N 2017
- Location
- Saint Paul, MN, USA
- Phone
- 6513305037
- Rating
- 72
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Arts Education
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $224,439
- Expenses
- $212,673
- Assets
- $91,138
- Liabilities
- $244,219
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- Logan Verdoorn (Artistic Director): $37,653 total reported compensation
- Victoria Signorelli (Board of Directors, Treasurer): $3,500 total reported compensation
- Maria Signorelli (Managing Director): $3,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Shakespearean Youth Theatre's mission is to inspire, empower and challenge young people to embody great works and create groundbreaking theatre through education, performance and ensemble-based collaboration.
What it reported doing in 2024
Ensemble Performance Programs: An intensive program for young artists. Students ages 12 - 19 work with a team of professional teaching artists to explore Shakespeare's language, develop foundational acting techniques, build an artistic ensemble, and present full productions of Shakespeare plays to their community. SYT offers the Ensemble Performance program three times each year. This year, 60 students worked with 15 professional teaching artists representing a wide range of specialties from speaking classical language and verse to stage combat for over 1000 contact hours. 1400 members of the public attended performances of MUCH ADO ABOUT NOTHING, THE TEMPEST and THE WINTERS TALE in Saint Paul and Minneapolis, MN.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 75
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 54
- Sustainability: 33
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 83%; rating input score 83
- Program expense ratio: 87.6%; rating input score 88
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 75%; rating input score 75; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 5.2%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.43; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 2.68; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 20.8%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -9% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 11.7% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -6% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 83% of revenue deployed · 87.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 4 board members independent · 2 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $186K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $38K · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 42 of 42 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 7 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 22/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 51/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 1/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 18/100.