Minnesota Regional Railroads Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
901111029
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2019–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2018, Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
St Paul, MN, USA
Phone
6127416647
Rating
36
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$159,914
Expenses
$161,601
Assets
$37,786
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • AMBER BACKHAUS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • MARK WEGNER (PRESIDENT)
  • LYDIA UNDERDAHL (1ST VICE PRESIDENT)
  • PETER GILBERTSON (2ND VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • AMBER BACKHAUS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • MARK WEGNER (PRESIDENT)
  • LYDIA UNDERDAHL (1ST VICE PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To promote the interests of the regional railroad industry; to promote an understanding of the common problems of the member roads and all other companies interested in regional transportation by rail; to improve business conditions of the regional railroads by an education program with the general public and personnel of the member roads; and to assist member roads by conducting research into the problems of transportation generally.

What it reported doing in 2025

The association hosted the annual midwest short line & regional railroads summer conference virtually in july. It held board meetings in-person and later via teleconference and participated in lobbying activities during the legislative session.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 78% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 35
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0.4%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -1.1%; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.23; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -5.7% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 3.8% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0.4% of revenue deployed
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2019 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 27/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 22/100.