Minnesota Occupational Therapy Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 416162467
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Fridley, MN, USA
- Phone
- 6126053307
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $71,637
- Expenses
- $71,347
- Assets
- $69,670
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- TERRIANNE JONES (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- TERRIANNE JONES (PRESIDENT)
- ALYSSA FARRELL (VP PROMOTIONS)
- KATHERINE NORTH (VP PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMEN)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Mota's mission is to enhance the professional development of its members, promote the profession of occupational therapy services across all practice arenas, populations and geographic locations in Minnesota. Mota is a member driven organization. Membership and participation are volunatary and essential to the ongoing success of the organization. Mota seeks to be responsive to the professional, educational, communicative and political needs of its members.
What it reported doing in 2024
Held an annual conference in november 2019 with over 200 attendees. The conference was a day and a half long event with over 30 breakout sessions that provided education, continuing education credits and networking opportunities for the attnedees. Mota also hosted special interest group meetings that offered continuing education credits to attendees and helped to inform attendees of issues related to occupational therapy practice.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 61% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 50
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0.4%; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.98; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -7.2% per year; rating input score 0; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1.6% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 46/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 46/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.