Minnesota Mechanical Contractors Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 410519110
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2013–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2012, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Minnetonka, MN, USA
- Phone
- 6516462121
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $40,000
- Expenses
- $37,905
- Assets
- $275,653
- Liabilities
- $21,323
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ANDY GRAHAM (PRESIDENT)
- ROSS NOAK (VICE PRESIDENT)
- MATT MARQUIS (EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- KENT BAKER (DIRECTOR)
- LYNN BISHOP (DIRECTOR)
- KRISTEN OLSON (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Minnesota mechanical contractors associations mission is to provide quality services to members, with an emphasis on labor relations, legislation, education, industry standards, and promotions.
What it reported doing in 2024
Minnesota mechanical contractors association identifies training needed most by members and their staff and then selects speakers from across the nation to provide the training necessary to make members competitive in the industry. They provide access to member resources through their website with documents and contracts. In addition, the website provides a detailed calendar listing upcoming seminars and events. Mmca has also created an informative newsletter that is sent to members to keep them aware of news and developments in the industry. The newsletter is sent out electronically approximately 8 times per year depending on the volume of information.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Membership-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 61
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 5.2%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 7.27; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.08; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -10.5% per year; rating input score 0; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8.1% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2013 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 55/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 19/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.