Minnesota Masonic Historic Buildings
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 475588074
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2017–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2016, Form 990-N 2018
- Location
- Bloomington, MN, USA
- Phone
- 9529486207
- Rating
- 68
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Historical Societies, Related Historical Activities
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $360,487
- Expenses
- $177,980
- Assets
- $2,001,803
- Liabilities
- $375,697
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
21 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JOHN SCHWIETZ (CEO - CHARITIES)
- ERIC J NEETENBEEK (PRESIDENT - CHARITIES)
Highest reported compensation
- JOHN SCHWIETZ (CEO - CHARITIES): $403,013 total reported compensation
- SUE MORK THRU SEPTEMBER 2024 (CFO - CHARITIES): $265,142 total reported compensation
- ERIC J NEETENBEEK (PRESIDENT - CHARITIES): $217,612 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To protect, preserve, restore, manage, maintain, own, and operate, directly or indirectly, the historic masonic buildings located in Minnesota.
What it reported doing in 2024
The corporation is created and organized to protect, preserve, restore, manage, maintain, own, and operate, directly or indirectly: (a) the duluth masonic temple located at 4 west second street, duluth, Minnesota 55802 (hereinafter, the "dmt"), which is listed on the national registry of historic places and which currently maintains, inter alia, a multi-volume historic library, numerous valuable collections and historical documents with respect to both the city of duluth and state of Minnesota history, and historic rare hand-painted theatrical scenic backdrops and scottish rite auditorium with its historic egyptian frieze, and (b) other historically and/or architecturally significant masonic buildings located in Minnesota (collectively, with the dmt, the "buildings"). Through its protection, preservation, restoration, management, maintenance, ownership, and operation of the buildings, the corporation will promote an appreciation of historical knowledge, and educate the public, about masonry in Minnesota, by making the buildings available for public viewing. The corporation may solicit funds to be used in accordance with Minnesota statute 317a, including but not limited to exterior and interior maintenance, restoration and preservation of the buildings, so they can be open for public uses, such as museums and libraries. Funds may also be utilized to maintain the furnishings, theatrical scenic backdrops, antiques and other items of historical, educational and cultural significance located in the buildings. Notwithstanding any other language or provisions contained herein, the purposes and activities will be limited exclusively to exempt purposes within the meaning of 501(c) of the code.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 76% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 61
- Transparency & Controls: 57
- Accountability: 91
- Sustainability: 73
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 49.3%; rating input score 49
- Program expense ratio: 99.9%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 84.6%; rating input score 85; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 50.6%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 11.25; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.19; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 48.1%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 27.9% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 14.8% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 28.8% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 49.3% of revenue deployed · 99.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $178K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $403K · 21 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 20 of 20 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2017 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 10 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 49/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 4/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 20/100.