Minnesota Family Council
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 411863170
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Saint Paul, MN, USA
- Phone
- 6127898811
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Standard
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $248,131
- Expenses
- $298,499
- Assets
- $714,786
- Liabilities
- $329,582
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JEFF EVANS (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- JEFF EVANS (CEO): $155,539 total reported compensation
- JOHN HELMBERGER (CONTRACTOR AND FORMER TREASURER): $130,833 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Minnesota family council (mfc) is a non-profit christian organization that is dedicated to strengthening Minnesota families by advancing biblical principles in the public arena, for the glory of the lord jesus christ and the good of society. Mfc defends traditional family values rooted in biblical principles against legislative action that threatens to undermine the civic, moral, economic, legal and social foundations of society in general and the family in particular mfc lobbyists endeavor to educate legislators about pending legislation that adversely affects the family and encourages them to advance legislation that strengthens the same.
What it reported doing in 2024
Over the years, mfc has gained the confidence and respect of elected officials and others through personal integrity, consistent focus on a christ-centered biblical perspective on policy, respectful consideration of opposing legislative perspectives, refusal to become immersed in a single-issue agenda and our growing, influential grassroots base. The media and even our ideological opponents look to us for legislative information and a pro-family perspective.Minnesota family council issues informational updates and commentaries sent out to thousands of Minnesota homes and businesses via email and direct mail. These communications feature inside information on legislative activity during the sessions, analysis of legislative voting records, cultural analysis and insightful pro-family perspective on news and issues impacting the family in the public arena, from a biblical worldview perspective.Minnesota family council has also exercised influence over the public debate through news releases, press conferences and a general strategy of appearing in the media. Spokespersons have appeared on national and regional television broadcasts, been interviewed numerous times on radio and television, and been quoted by many regional and national media organizations. Based on christians' calling to "practice citizenship worthy of the gospel of christ" (philippians 1:27), Minnesota family council has organized pro-life and pro-family citizens across the state into a grassroots network as a "salt and light" christian influence on public policy on a variety of issues and to mobilize faithful voters in elections faithful to vote, consistent with their faith and biblical values (matthew 5:13-16). For the 2022 election, mfc continued its redesigned voter guide, previously produced by mfc's educational arm, mfi, especially for use in churches, emphasizing "the power of biblical citizenship". This is god-centered christian citizenship for the sake of the gospel of jesus christ, the only power on earth that can truly change hearts, minds, lives, and cultures.defending religious freedom, protecting the sanctity of life, and upholding god's design for marriage, sexuality and family have been prominent among the issues on which Minnesota family council has engaged. To activate its grassroots network, Minnesota family council employs a wide range of communications channels to reach thousands of constituent households with timely action alerts. These action alerts identify social issues of significant magnitude that need immediate response from concerned citizens. Constituents are encouraged to contact their legislators and leaders of other public institutions, to write letters to the editors of the community newspapers of their choice using our online advocacy tools, and get out and vote. These tools have encouraged a groundswell of grassroots activism that has been acknowledged by elected officials and opposition groups alike, as they have seen its influence in the state.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 85% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 71
- Transparency & Controls: 80
- Accountability: 86
- Sustainability: 27
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 75.5%; rating input score 76
- Program expense ratio: 62.8%; rating input score 63
- Fundraising efficiency: $35.32 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -20.3%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.39; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.46; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 95.9%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -7.1% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 10.3% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 75.5% of revenue deployed · 62.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $187K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $156K · 8 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 14/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 12/100.