Minnesota Crs Chapter Inc C/o Minnesota Association of Realtors
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 411735320
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2014
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2014
- Location
- Edina, MN, USA
- Phone
- 9529122664
- Rating
- 68
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Real Estate Associations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $45,217
- Expenses
- $57,685
- Assets
- $47,511
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- TOM SLUPSKE (PRESIDENT)
- DAN BOMAN (PASE-PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- TOM SLUPSKE (PRESIDENT)
- DAN BOMAN (PASE-PRESIDENT)
- SANDY MAXWELL (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide member benefits enabling residential sales specialists to maximize their professional performance.
What it reported doing in 2014
Meetings during the year provide members with real estate continuing education. These meetings are held at local hotels and clubs. The meetings are led by the president and other officers in addition to guest speakers. Chapter members staff a booth at various local association events. They provide various educational information and promote membership.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 77% for direct work, and 23% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 63
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 36
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 68.8%; rating input score 69
- Program expense ratio: 53%; rating input score 53
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -27.6%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.82; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -0.7% per year; rating input score 0; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.7% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -5.4% per year; rating input score 0; 30th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 68.8% of revenue deployed · 53% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $31K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2010 to 2014
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 53/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 17/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 43/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.