Minnesota Alliance for Patient Safety

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
454173347
IRS 990 coverage
2013–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2017
Location
Bloomington, MN, USA
Phone
9528538559
Rating
73
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Group Health Practice (Health Maintenance Organizations)

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$98,529
Expenses
$188,560
Assets
$215,319
Liabilities
$21,251

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

15 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JENNIFER LUNDBLAD (STRATIS HEALTH CEO/MAPS VICE CHAIR)
  • HEIDI HOLSTE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • JENNIFER LUNDBLAD (STRATIS HEALTH CEO/MAPS VICE CHAIR): $323,898 total reported compensation
  • MICHAEL NOVAK (STRATIS HEALTH CFO): $180,570 total reported compensation
  • LISA JULIAR (DIRECTOR): $71,681 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Minnesota alliance for patient safety (maps) utilizes diverse stakeholders to address patient safety issues for which collaborative action will advance the state toward the vision of safe care everywhere.

What it reported doing in 2024

Safe care everywhere remains the singular focus and mission of the Minnesota alliance for patient safety (maps), as preventable medical errors continue to be one of the leading causes of death in the united states. For 24 years, maps has relentlessly convened the community and healthcare partners in pursuit of safe care everywhere, while remaining the only non-profit within Minnesota to represent patient safety in all corners of our state: outpatient to acute care, surgery to long term care, pediatrics to geriatrics, patient to board room, physician to payer, private to government and beyond. The Minnesota alliance for patient safety (maps) works to accelerate Minnesota patient safety outcomes so that every resident, and every healthcare encounter, is safe while receiving healthcare services. Maps addresses preventable harm and death in Minnesota caused by medical error through leading and inspire patient safety solutions in partnership with a coalition of dedicated Minnesota residents, patients, patient advocates, frontline healthcare professionals, healthcare delivery systems and health plans. Maps devoted board of directors, member groups that represent the full care continuum in Minnesota's healthcare and long term care community, dedicated personnel and two crucial networks: the network of patient/patient partners and the network of mn safety executives work tirelessly to engage, educate and equip the right people at the right time to achieve safe care everywhere. Much work is done within various organizations and healthcare systems within Minnesota and beyond when it comes to patient safety. Maps is the conduit that works to disseminate successful initiatives for broad and quick adaptation across care settings, collaborating on how to operationalize patient safety science, and creating disruptive innovation that is by those who need or receive care in direct partnership with those who deliver care. Our efforts in 2024 included: engage:- network of Minnesota patient safety executives: monthly meetings of Minnesota patient safety executives sponsored and co-facilitated by maps- we convene a unique statewide network of safety executives from numerous different health care service delivery organizations across the care continuum to discuss emerging and long-standing issues in patient safety. - maps board of directors from healthcare and long-term care sector in Minnesota. - maps general supporters [1000+ people opted in to engage in maps mission via email, social media, etc.]- maps held monthly zoom lunch and learns for the community to engage in presentations and discussions around patient safety.- maps partnered with local hospital systems to host caring safely tours where attendees, called safety fellows, safety fellows from multiple organizations who came to learn, share, and strategize together. Educate:- harvests successful safety solutions (both completed projects and brainstormed ideas) and share these best practices through multiple modalities.- formalize storytelling, coaching and training that support our member organizations in their safety work. Equip:- maintain and grow a patient story database- participate in adverse health event reporting system changeswe are active participants in the evolution of this system that exists today and will work to replicate the success to be applied to settings beyond the hospital systems. Learning from mistakes and improving systems to prevent them in the future is key to positive safety outcomes for patients and families. - in person and virtual expertise shared with students, community members and organizations with intent on sharing a broad range of tools through speaking opportunities, conferences and workshops as a patient safety content expert.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 73% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 88
  • Transparency & Controls: 70
  • Accountability: 79
  • Sustainability: 21
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 96.6%; rating input score 97
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 80%; rating input score 80; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -91.4%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.14; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.1; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 69%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -5.8% per year; rating input score 0; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -10.9% per year; rating input score 0; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -1.4% per year; rating input score 0; 33rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 96.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 12 of 15 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $182K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $324K · 15 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 16 of 16 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2013 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 22/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 26/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 5/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 18/100.