Minnesota 4-H Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
411408161
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2017
Forms available
Form 990 2017
Location
St Paul, MN, USA
Phone
6126247971
Rating
67
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Youth Development - Agricultural

Reported finances

Revenue
$961,443
Expenses
$574,656
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

20 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Jane Johnson (Interim Executive Director)

People named in this filing

  • Peter Scheffert (Board Member, Chairperson)
  • Karen O'Hara (Board Member, Treasurer)
  • Mary Bartz (Board Member, Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Minnesota 4-H Foundation, a 501(c)3 nonprofit, was created in 1981 to generate private funds from individuals, corporations and foundations to assist the University of Minnesota Extension Center for Youth Development in creating and delivering the finest youth development programs in Minnesota. We specifically strive to raise financial support for a variety of 4-H programs at the state level, in each of Minnesota's 87 counties and in partnership with tribal nations. 4-H is open to boys and girls from all backgrounds between the ages of 5- 19. Our goal is to provide all Minnesota young people with opportunities to learn, lead and succeed.

What it reported doing in 2017

The Minnesota 4-H Foundation works alongside the University of Minnesota Extension Center for Youth Development to sustain and grow 4-H program opportunities around the state. For over 100 years, 4-H programs have intentionally sought to assist young people in developing their health, social, cognitive, and citizenship competencies while participating in voluntary 4-H projects/programs. Since they are active in these programs from elementary into middle school and through high school, research has shown that 4-H'ers are less likely to spend time watching TV or playing video games and are less likely to smoke or consume alcohol or exhibit riskier behavior than their peers. In contrast, 4-H'ers are more likely to be civically active. Annually, over 67,000 Minnesota youth, because of 4-H, enjoy a greater sense of belonging, have quality relationships with their friends and family and are more actively involved in their school and community. This past year there has been an emphasis on reaching out to "First Generation" participants -- those families who have not been associated with 4-H before. This includes the growing immigrant population around the state. Minnesota 4-H is drawing in a number of new participants and witnessing the growth and connectivity that 4-H brings within the families as they experience a quality youth program. We can thank nearly 11,000 screened and trained adult volunteers who assist our youth annually. These volunteers embrace 4-H's research-based, learn-by-doing model and bring their own, rich life experiences to equip youth participants with skills such as problem solving, decision making and communicating - essential for our youth to be successful as students, professionals, and community members. These volunteers, from all walks of life and from all age ranges, are credited with contributing more than 1 million hours of service each year. They partner with 4-H staff to deliver the quality programs for which 4-H is well known (after-school programs, community service, civic engagement and camping programs) and are instrumental in supporting and developing new and innovative program initiatives.According to a study by Tufts University, 4-H youth development programs have a greater impact on the positive development of young people than any other youth program. The study also shows that youth who participate in 4-H are more likely to attend college than their peers. We know that youth involved in 4-H clubs are less likely to spend six or more hours a day watching TV or playing video games and are less likely to smoke, consume alcohol or ride with a driver who was drinking. 4-H participants also report having a greater sense of belonging, quality relationships with their friends, enjoy being with their family and have more involvement in their school and community. Because of these outcomes, we are proud to support Minnesota 4-H.Minnesota 4-H's research-based curriculum includes a focus in four major areas in order to ensure positive youth development and quality learning opportunities outside of school: Healthy Living: Healthy living has been a core priority of Minnesota 4-H from its beginning. By supporting the physical, mental and emotional health of our youth, we help them lead healthy and productive lives into adulthood. Programs address such critical issues as childhood obesity, substance abuse and physical safety. The Minnesota 4-H Foundation has supported grants to regional 4-H programs promoting physical activity called STEP; geocaching programs that focus on getting young people out in nature; and a healthy cooking contest for 4-H participants at the Minnesota State Fair.4-H Science: The U.S. is falling behind other nations in developing its future workforce of scientists, engineers and technology experts. Minnesota 4-H's initiative in Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM) helps youth become the next generation of scientists, engineers and technology leaders by actively engaging in

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 91% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 98% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and the required major-donor schedule is missing or incomplete.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 57
  • Transparency & Controls: 76
  • Accountability: 94
  • Sustainability: 53
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 58.1%; rating input score 58
  • Program expense ratio: 61.3%; rating input score 61
  • Fundraising efficiency: $10.94 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 94.1%; rating input score 94; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 94.4%; rating input score 94; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: No; rating input score 0
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 86
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 40.2%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -7.3% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -0.2% per year; rating input score 0; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -4.1% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 58.1% of revenue deployed · 61.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 19 of 19 board members independent · 6 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $352K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 20 people listed
  • Consistency: 24 of 25 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2009 to 2017
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 10 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 10 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 58/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Major donor itemization scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 44/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.