Minneapolis Postal Customer Council
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 411702023
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2018
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2018
- Location
- Little Canada, MN, USA
- Phone
- 6513404337
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $20,949
- Expenses
- $20,251
- Assets
- $23,919
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
People named in this filing
- Diane Dotzler (Industry Co-Chair)
- Will Jones (Postal Co-Chair)
- John Morgan (Postal Co-Chair)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Educating mailers and vendors with workshops and seminars for everything dealing with the mailing industry from basic MailOps 101 to the EVOLVE conference (1 day educational presentations; motivational speakers)
What it reported doing in 2018
Educating mailers and vendors with workshops and seminars for everything dealing with the mailing industry from basic MailOps 101 to the EVOLVE conference (1 day educational presentations; motivational speakers) Seminars -- over 200 registrants for workshops regarding ways to run a mailroom, achieve efficiencies, and network with other mailing and postal professionals.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 92% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Member-benefit provider. The nonprofit used 91% of its reported program spending for member benefits.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 92
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 55
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 90.9%; rating input score 91
- Program expense ratio: 94.1%; rating input score 94
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 3.3%; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.18; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -4.2% per year; rating input score 0; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0.3% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 30.2% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 90.9% of revenue deployed · 94.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $19K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2010 to 2018
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 53/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 52/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.