Ministries of Jesus
Legal name: Ministries of Jesus Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 731622804
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Edmond, OK, USA
- Phone
- (405) 340-7400
- Rating
- 73
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Interfaith Coalitions
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,344,815
- Expenses
- $1,545,448
- Assets
- $10,702,671
- Liabilities
- $130,821
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- JOSEPH PIERCE (Executive Dir.): $122,614 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our Mission To reflect the heart of Jesus by delivering exceptional healthcare rooted in compassion, integrity, and faith. “The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he has anointed me to proclaim good news to the poor. He has sent me to proclaim liberty to the captives and recovering of sight to the blind, to set at liberty those who are oppressed, to proclaim the year of the Lord’s favor.”. We follow the example of Jesus by demonstrating His love through compassionate care Our Vision.
What it reported doing in 2024
Transformation christian counseling helps people experience emotionalhealing in their lives, so they can learn to: love god, love people, & makedisciples. Counseling is offered in the following areas: depression, anxiety, family counseling, marital, divorce, abortion, abuse, pregnancy, grief, life transition, personality disorders, and trauma. The counselingclinic fees are determined by the client's income level using a slidingscale. Through the services of 7 professional counselors and 2 interns, theclinic provided over 2,100 hours of counseling. Counselors donated morethan $219,000 worth of services to ministries of jesus, inc. Over the pastyear. Our counselors served 100 new clients during this period. They alsoexpanded their services to include an option to meet virtually.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 81% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 68
- Transparency & Controls: 74
- Accountability: 90
- Sustainability: 46
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 78.4%; rating input score 78
- Program expense ratio: 64.6%; rating input score 65
- Fundraising efficiency: $6.64 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -14.9%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.93; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1% per year; rating input score 100; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -5.1% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.5% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 78.4% of revenue deployed · 64.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 12 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $999K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $123K · 12 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 25/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 12/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 55/100.