Minidoka Health Care Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 820531304
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2014–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2022, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2012
- Location
- Rupert, ID, USA
- Rating
- 52
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Health - General and Rehabilitative N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $161,832
- Expenses
- $152,491
- Assets
- $164,604
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- RICK BOLLAR (President)
- MATT DARRINGTON (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- LORI JOHNSON (Secretary)
- KERRY ARRITT (Trustee)
- TAMMY HANKS (Executive Dir.)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Minidoka health care foundation is a non-profit organization established to promote quality health care in minidoka county. It's mission is to solicit, receive and be responsible for gifts given to support and enhance health related causes.
What it reported doing in 2024
The most popular of the foundation events is "caring and charing christmas" a decorated tree festival that occurs annually in conjunction with the city of rupert-christmas city USA events during thanksgiving weekend. Produced by volunteers the festival helps create a funding base for foundation programs. A spectacular showcase of decorated trees, wreaths, and other items for sale, non-stop entertainment, a food court, and gift shop. Admission is always free. Sponsor spots are available.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 31
- Transparency & Controls: 74
- Sustainability: 49
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 29.9%; rating input score 30
- Program expense ratio: 31.8%; rating input score 32
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 5.8%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.08; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.7% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 11.2% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -7.5% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 29.9% of revenue deployed · 31.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $48K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 7 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2014 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 30/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 32/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 49/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.