Mini Minds
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 990444638
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2024–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- Eaton, OH, USA
- Phone
- 9373451859
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Kindergarten, Preschool, Nursery School, Early Admissions
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,060,206
- Expenses
- $1,058,399
- Assets
- $3,312,509
- Liabilities
- $1,211
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MARY BULLEN (PRESIDENT)
- HAROLD NIEHAUS (VICE PRESIDENT)
- CHRISTINA REVEAL (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- CHRISTINA REVEAL (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $119,240 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To champion high-quality early learning and healthy development strategies from the prenatal period to age eleven and lay a strong foundation for preble county kids, families, and the community.
What it reported doing in 2025
Preble mini minds provides high-quality early childhood education and development services to children 6 weeks to 12 years old. Programming focuses on preparing children for success in school and life through individualized, evidence-based educational and social-emotional learning practices. Preble mini minds utilizes creative curriculum, a play-based, whole-child curriculum incorporating daily literacy instruction grounded in the science of reading. Through intentional learning experiences, children develope language, literacy, phonological awareness, math, problem-solving, and other school-readiness skills. Individual assessments are used to monitor development, guide instruction, and cummunicate progress with families. For 2025, pre-k outcomes demonstrated strong academic readiness: at the fall checkpoint, 100% of pre-k children not receiving services through an individualized education program (iep) met the widely held expectations for math and language development. Preble mini minds also utilized conscious discipline to support children's social-emotional development. This approach equips educators to foster self-regulation, positive relationships, conflict-resolution skills, responsible decision-making, and cooperative classroom environments. Preble mini minds strengthened its services through partnerships with six community organizations: national trail district future farmers of america, preble county district library, preble county osu extension office, early childhood collaborative, family and children first council, and early head start for preble county. These partnerships expanded educational experiences, family resources, and connections to community-based services for children and families.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 89
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 81
- Sustainability: 50
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 90.2%; rating input score 90
- Program expense ratio: 90.3%; rating input score 90
- Fundraising efficiency: $76.49 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 85.7%; rating input score 86; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0.2%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.13; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 11.3%; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 136.9% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -107.6% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 0% per year; rating input score 100; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 90.2% of revenue deployed · 90.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 7 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $955K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $119K · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 31/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 34/100.