Be Well Orange County
Legal name: Mind Oc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 823901590
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2018–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Jul 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Orange, CA, US
- Phone
- (949) 749-2500
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $53,889,848
- Expenses
- $34,021,036
- Assets
- $198,053,850
- Liabilities
- $45,454,969
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
21 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- PHILLIP FRANKS (CEO)
- RICHARD AFABLE (PRESIDENT/BOARD CHAIR)
- LAUREN BRANDTERM END 424 (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, CAMPUS OPERATIONS)
- MARSHALL MONCRIEF (FORMER CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- PHILLIP FRANKS (CEO): $436,689 total reported compensation
- VICTOR JORDAN (CFO): $414,654 total reported compensation
- DESIREE THOMAS (COO): $345,944 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Mind oc is the nonprofit behind the be well oc coalition that will lead the nation in optimal mental healthcare for all residents of orange county, ca.
What it reported doing in 2024
Community initiativessuicide prevention services is for individuals, primarily from the uninsured and underinsured population, for the purpose of increasing knowledge and awareness regarding mental health, stigma, suicide prevention, and intervention, as well as providing support services for those in need and those directly affected by suicide.behavioral health service transformation (bhst) be well oc brings together a community of action by leveraging collective power to transform mental health service and delivery into a world-class system of care. Our success starts with acceptance that the mental health sector alone cannot solve all of the challenges of this complex and pervasive health challenge. Be well oc brings together a robust, community-based, cross-sector strategy of public-private, academic, faith, and other organizations to positively impact those challenges that diminish mental health and well-being.adverse childhood experiences (aces)in partnership with more than 20 health systems, county and community-based organizations, mind oc, has been awarded $3 million over 17 months from the aces aware grant program, developed by the California department of health care services in partnership with the office of the California surgeon general. The project aims to implement a broad and inclusive trauma-informed network of care for orange county, which will ultimately work to prevent adverse childhood experiences (aces), promote ace screening in children and adults, improve treatment of ace-associated health conditions, and prevent intergenerational toxic stress transmission. Youth opioid use prevention services is for individuals, primarily from the uninsured and underinsured population, and who follow into the age range of 12 to 24 years old who are at risk of opioid use disorder (oud) or at risk of an opioid overdose. This program aims to provide outreach, education, and treatment for at risk youth with the goal of reducing opioid use and overdose in orange county.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 85% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 70
- Transparency & Controls: 89
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 78
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 56.5%; rating input score 57
- Program expense ratio: 84.9%; rating input score 85
- Fundraising efficiency: $150.07 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 87.5%; rating input score 88; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 6 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 96.3%; rating input score 96; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 36.9%; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.82; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.23; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 8.2%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 42.6% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 28.2% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 34.5% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 56.5% of revenue deployed · 84.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 10 of 11 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $28.9M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $437K · 21 people listed · 6 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $36.3M reported
- Consistency: 30 of 32 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2018 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 13 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 57/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 5/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.