Mind and Breath Research Institute

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
264148589
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2015
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2015, Form 990-N 2010
Location
Washington, DC, USA
Phone
2029030866
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Education N.E.C.

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$2,535
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MANOJ MATHUR (President)

People named in this filing

  • NEERAJ KAUSHIK (Secretary)
  • MANOJ MATHUR (President)
  • MADHUSRI TEJASVI (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Mind and Breath Research Institute (Organization) was established to promote and conduct research related to the interconnection between meditation and other controlled breathing techniques and a persons physical, mental and emotional well-being. The Organization intends to enhance health-care delivery throughout the world by providing innovative solutions to the treatment of chronic, acute and systemic illnesses, diseases and conditions by demonstrating the palliative effects of meditation and other controlled breathing and relaxation techniques.

What it reported doing in 2015

Organization conducts yoga courses. During the year 2015, organization conducted approximately 950 "Yoga" Sessions and more than 2000 people got benefited in these sessions.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 38
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 7
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -30.8% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -45.2% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -57.9% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $3K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2011 to 2015
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.