Mimosa International Foundation of America Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
851472137
IRS 990 coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-N 2020
Location
Henrico, VA, USA
Phone
7572186841
Rating
59
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Private Operating Foundations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$7,352
Expenses
$12,998
Assets
$19,184
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • GWENDOLYN THORNTON (CEO)

People named in this filing

  • GWENDOLYN THORNTON (CEO)
  • Sandra Peay (Director)
  • Sandra Jones (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

MIFoA strives to provide educational opportunities and resources for children and families in underserved and remote communities across the continent of Africa and the African Diaspora to help them achieve self-sufficiency.

What it reported doing in 2025

In December 2017, the co-founders of the MIFoA (Gwen Thornton, PhD LCSW and Jane Parker, MSW, Department of Social Work faculty members) in partnership with the Virginia State University Office of International Education sponsored a faculty led study-abroad trip that offered students a two-week global service-learning opportunity in Jukwa and Winneba, Ghana, West Africa. Students and the faculty worked alongside local community partners to identify and complete needed tasks for a number of community projects. While working with local community partners, they had an impactful, immersive, and life-changing experience. During their time in Ghana, they were approached by Ghanaian children and families asking for their help. These individuals were not merely seeking handouts but opportunities to have a better life than what they were accustomed to in their experiences. While in Ghana during this time, the faculty and students developed relationships with Ghanaian residents and community partners that have remained strong for more than 3 and half years.In 2019, between August and November, Dr. Thornton spent three months on sabbatical in the Central Region of Ghana where she initiated various activities that set the foundation for creating the MIFoA. The primaryobjective of Dr. Thorntons sabbatical was to engage in and collaborate with community leaders regarding community, healthcare and educational needs in the Central Region of Ghana. During this time period, incollaboration with school administrators, faculty, staff, parents and community leaders she provided her expertise, knowledge and skills in community and program development. She assisted in the development of a5-year Educational Strategic Plan for Divine Kids Academy (DKA). As a result of this initiative, she assisted in identifying a network of international donors (colleagues and friends) for the provision of educational resourcesand equipment for academic success of children attending DKA. The engagement, collaboration and partnership with donors resulted in the purchase of desks, textbooks, computers and building of a computer lab for grades one through grade six. These collaborative efforts inspired the formation of the Mimosa International Foundation of America, Inc.Upon Dr. Thorntons return to the United States, in December 2019, the Mimosa International Foundation of America was founded by a group of individuals who shared a common interest in providing healthcare, educational, vocational training, other charitable services and resources to underprivileged women, children and families in underserved remote areas across the continent of Africa and the African Diaspora to help them to achieve self-sufficiency. MIFoA strives to improve the education, healthcare and vocational training opportunities for women, children and families in the Eastern and Western regions of Africa. We also aim to foster a better understanding of the multicultural nature of Africans through interpersonal connections that our volunteers will make in the Eastern and Western regions of Africa.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 55
  • Transparency & Controls: 80
  • Accountability: 58
  • Sustainability: 34
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 65.3%; rating input score 65
  • Program expense ratio: 36.9%; rating input score 37
  • Fundraising efficiency: $14.7 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 88.9%; rating input score 89; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 0 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -76.8%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.48; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 65.3% of revenue deployed · 36.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 0 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $5K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 14 of 15 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 37/100.
  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 6 not reported.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Foreign grants require schedule f did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 20/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 33/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 58/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.