Milwaukie El Puente PTO
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 823187786
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2025
- Location
- Milwaukie, OR, USA
- Rating
- 71
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Parent/Teacher Group
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $26,391
- Expenses
- $16,843
- Assets
- $74,813
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Jamie Adlawan (President)
People named in this filing
- Jamie Adlawan (President)
- Vanessa Todd-Holmes (Secretary)
- Heidi Hiaasen-Gerke (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The PTO was organized for the purpose of supporting the education of the children at Milwaukie El Puente Elementary School by fostering relationships among the school parents teachers principal staff and community through shared values of inclusion and equity. This is done by community building volunteering holding meetings and events supporting educational and enrichment programs charitable functions and fundraising to meet the needs of the organization.
What it reported doing in 2025
Our nonprofit fosters educational growth and community cohesion by providing a range of essential resources. These include books for the library to enhance literacy and learning opportunities. Additionally we supply PE and recess equipment to promote physical activity and social development among students. Moreover we support classrooms with necessary supplies ensuring a conducive learning environment. Lastly we organize community-building activities and clubs to encourage social interaction and a sense of belonging among participants.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 94% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 69
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 70
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 56.8%; rating input score 57
- Program expense ratio: 89%; rating input score 89
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 36.2%; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.44; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 56.8% of revenue deployed · 89% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $15K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 57/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.