Milwaukee Global Health Consortium Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
391953251
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2016–2019
Forms available
Form 990 2015, Form 990-EZ 2019
Location
Milwaukee, WI, USA
Phone
4142195488
Rating
59
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
International Development

Reported finances

Revenue
$108,449
Expenses
$147,352
Assets
$11,021
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

People named in this filing

  • ALEXANDER DURTKA (DIRECTOR)
  • ALLAN GRAY (DIRECTOR)
  • CATHY BUCK RN MS (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Milwaukee global health consortium, inc.'s purpose is to advance health training and education as well as provide consulting and technical assistance regarding health issues. The organization is located in Wisconsin and provides services throughout the world. Accordingly the community has made a substantial investment in the organization through pledges, contributions and various other forms of support.

What it reported doing in 2019

The tanzania nursing education project connects team members from uw-milwaukee adn concordia university to work with faculty from two schools of nursing in mwanza, tanzania. This onging project seeks to strengthen clinical skills teaching and acquisition for nursing students in mwanza.the our city of nations initiative includes an inter-professional conference held every 18 months. It also entails the collection and dissemination of ongoing activities, events, and resources by milwaukee-area organizations that interface with refugee and immigrants in the education, health, and social service sectors.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 36
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 21
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 39.9%; rating input score 40
  • Program expense ratio: 29.4%; rating input score 29

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -35.9%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.07; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -8.6% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -15.8% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -21.3% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 39.9% of revenue deployed · 29.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $43K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2016 to 2019
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 40/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 29/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 8/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.