Milton Township Food Pantry Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
270007268
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Wheaton, IL, USA
Phone
6306681616
Rating
71
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Food Banks, Pantries

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$154,415
Expenses
$40,173
Assets
$222,633

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

People named in this filing

  • JOHN MONINO (CHAIR)
  • JEFF CASTLE (MEMBER)
  • ANDREW ELLIS (MEMBER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To ensure all residents of milton township are provided with access to a variety of healthy, nutritious, and sustainable food items and personal hygiene supplies, obtained through charitable donations and contributions and distributed to those in need of assistance with absolute dignity, honor, respect, and without judgments.

What it reported doing in 2024

Milton township is fighting food insecurity. In 2025, 13,160 residents through visits were provided nutrious food(dairy, meat, produce), sundries, personal care items, and holiday meals. The pantry is operated by 350 volunteers through community donations. Over 32,850 pounds of food were donated and distributed.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 44
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 81
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 21.2%; rating input score 21
  • Program expense ratio: 81.5%; rating input score 82

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 74%; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.54; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 20.5% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 35.7% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 26.6% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 21.2% of revenue deployed · 81.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $33K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 21/100.