Millstone Township First Aid Squad Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 521845795
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2019–2020
- Forms available
- Form 990 2018, Form 990-EZ 2020
- Location
- Millstone Township, NJ, USA
- Phone
- 7327927805
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Ambulance, Emergency Medical Transport Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $36,063
- Expenses
- $303,055
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- NANCY PARMEGIANI (PRESIDENT)
- ROBERT TRIFIRO (VICE PRESIDENT/SECRETARY)
People named in this filing
- NANCY PARMEGIANI (PRESIDENT)
- ROBERT TRIFIRO (VICE PRESIDENT/SECRETARY)
- MIKE MALONEY (GENERAL MANAGER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide emergency first aid and medical assistance and ambulance services to the residents of millstone township, monmouth county, nj, and the surrounding area, as well as the general public at large on a volunteer basis.
What it reported doing in 2020
Mtfas responded to various emergency first aid assistance calls during the 2020 calendar year including personal emergency medical calls, motor vehicle accidents, fires and standby calls, and provide first aid and ambulatory support to local surrounding hospitals.per the organization's plan of dissolution, the organization contributed all of its remaining assets (equipment and leasehold improvements) to the millstone county fire company on november 30, 2020. The organization dissolved with the state of New Jersey on december 24, 2020.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 70% for direct work, and 30% for grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 92
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 9
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 77.7%; rating input score 78
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -740.3%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 114.2% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.8% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -11.7% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 77.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $236K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2019 to 2020
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.